Featured

To Kill a Mockingbird and The Hate U Give: The Problem with Feeling Safe

Revisiting To Kill a Mockingbird: The Moment My Faith Was Shaken

During the Fall semester, I took a class titled Fiction in the Culture Wars. Throughout the semester, my classmates and I read Mark Twain’s The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird and Go Set a Watchman and Angie Thomas’ The Hate U Give. As we worked through each text, we discussed critical issues surrounding them such as empathy, the function of these texts within the literary canon and how studying these texts fits into civil rights and antiracism. 

Through discussions with my classmates and professor, I became particularly interested in To Kill a Mockingbird. For some people, this novel is the holy grail of literature and damn anybody that has anything negative to say about it. One of my projects during the semester tasked me with interviewing a former teacher of mine regarding one of the aforementioned texts. I chose to interview my 10th grade English teacher also known as the person that taught me To Kill a Mockingbird. We had a lengthy discussion about the importance of this book. My former teacher raved about it and talked fondly about the years she spent teaching it to her students. In my feedback for this assignment, my professor said that he was glad there are still people who have faith in To Kill a Mockingbird like my teacher. When I told her this, she was horrified at the mere suggestion that a fellow English teacher did not have full faith in To Kill a Mockingbird. It was at this precise moment that I began to think about my guiding question for this blog post: why do white people love and defend To Kill a Mockingbird so much? 

Now, I know some people might question my authority on this subject because I am a cisgender white man. I have no problem admitting that I have also been drawn to defend To Kill a Mockingbird. I read it in high school and loved it. I reread it for the first time in this class and fell in love with it all over again. I openly admitted to crying at certain points throughout the novel (Yes, the infamous court scene was one of them.) On our class discussion board, I wrote many posts and replies to posts trying to reposit this novel back onto its metaphorical pedestal. However, this was also part of the driving force of this project for me. Was I, and my fellow white people, so quick to defend this novel because of nostalgia or something else? After careful consideration, and after studying a more contemporary novel that deals with the same issue of racial injustice like Angie Thomas’ The Hate U Give, I am going to argue the latter. 

Gathering Research: Opinions on To Kill a Mockingbird

To tackle this question, one of the first things I did was find other opinions on the subject. Oddly enough, asking Google why white people loved To Kill a Mockingbird so much was a sufficient search for the purposes of my blog. This search drew me to one of my first sources: a Washington Post article written by Errin Haines titled “The truths ‘To Kill a Mockingbird’ tells about white people.” This article, written in July of 2020, included Haines’ thoughts on the novel after rereading it for the 60th anniversary. After recalling reading this novel for the first time as a teenage black woman living in America, Haines states, 

This anniversary coincides with a national reckoning on race that is challenging America’s long-held beliefs and long-standing institutions. The moment presents an opportunity for Americans to finally read “Mockingbird” for the story it is — not the one too many would like for it to be. To do so is to not only see the truth Lee tries to tell in its pages but to begin to understand the truth about America (¶ 4). 

I was specifically struck by Haines’ assertion that many Americans enjoy To Kill a Mockingbird because it is a story that they want it to be. When a story is put on such an unreachably high pedestal, it begs the question as to who put it there. Haines also talks at length about the black characters within the novel. Specifically, she compares and contrasts the characterization of the white and black characters. She argues that we learn the white characters’ “personalities, mannerisms, dress and histories” while the black characters are “obscured from us” (¶ 8). She concludes this argument by meditating on white privilege, “white privilege means not actually having to know black or brown people, to live among them but to never really see them, even in one’s own house” (¶ 8).

First, the obscuring of black characters is something I picked up on more during my second reading of the novel. I think Haines does an excellent job of explaining this phenomenon within the novel; while we are told the entire history and lineage of certain white families, we never really learn much about the black characters. This goes into a deeper point regarding the Finch’s maid, Calpurnia. Her sole function in the novel is to dole out wisdom and act as the mother Scout and Jem never had. As Haines puts it, Scout, Jem and Atticus never really see her for anything other than their maid. Although Haines is focusing on To Kill a Mockingbird, this quote made me think about the scene in Go Set a Watchman where Scout (going by Jean Louise later in life) visits Calpurnia after the latter’s grandson gets into legal trouble. Jean Louise/Scout cannot begin to understand why Calpurnia is giving her the cold shoulder despite recently uncovering her father Atticus’ own racist views. Hmm, I wonder why Calpurnia didn’t want to associate with the Finch’s anymore after Atticus started reading books on why desegregation was a bad thing?

Anyway, back to Mockingbird. Sharing similar views to Haines, author Roxane Gay also wrote an article about her feelings on To Kill a Mockinbgird in the New York Times. Specifically, she wrote a book review of Tom Santopietro aptly titled novel, Why ‘To Kill a Mockingbird’ Matters: What Harper Lee’s Book and the Iconic American Film Mean to Us Today. While discussing the black characters, Gay, a bisexual black woman herself, writes,

“The black characters — Robinson and the family’s housekeeper, Calpurnia — are mostly there as figures onto which the white people around them can project various thoughts and feelings. They are narrative devices, not fully realized human beings” (¶ 2).

Just as Haines argues, Gay affirms that the black characters simply function as plot devices and exist to further the character arcs of the white characters. Gay goes on to explain that Santopietro’s defense of To Kill a Mockingbird (and subsequently the latter itself),

“Never does this book take chances or make a persuasive argument for why To Kill a Mockingbird matters to anyone but white people who inexplicably still do not understand the ills of racism, and seemingly need this book to show them the light” (¶ 5).

I found Gay’s statement here to be really thought provoking. It is hard to believe that this novel would be the “light” to expose people to the ills of racism, yet I can’t think of another text that is taught so widely and early on that deals with racial injustice. For some students, this very well could be their first in depth unmasking of the racist history of America’s justice system. But is this enough? I’d argue that it isn’t, simply because To Kill a Mockingbird addresses racism in a very safe way. Which leads me into the next section of this post regarding everyone’s favorite lawyer: Atticus Finch. 

Examining Atticus Finch’s White Saviorism 

Gregory Peck and Brock Peters as Atticus Finch and Tom Robinson in the 1962 film version of To Kill a Mockingbird.

The white savior is a trope in which a white character saves people of color from some sort of plight. Depending on the context of the movie/novel/TV show/etc, this plight can take on many variations. The white person almost always learns some sort of lesson at the end while the people of color remain one-dimensional throughout the work. Films such as The Help and Green Book, two films criticized for their depiction of the white savior trope, often receive many nominations during awards season (the latter actually won Best Picture during the 2019 Academy Awards.)  See where this is going? Enter Atticus Finch, the lovable father and staunch defender of justice from To Kill a Mockingbird.

Not only is he one of the most famous literary characters, but due to Gregory Pecks’ Academy Award winning performance (there it is again) as Atticus in the film, Atticus was quickly solidified as one of the greatest fictional characters of all time. Back in 2016, even after the revelation in Go Set a Watchman that Atticus wasn’t actually all that great, The Guardian reported that he was still voted as literature’s most stirring hero by thousands of UK readers. He even beat out heavyweights such as Harry Potter and Katniss Everdeen for this title. I would even wager that if you ask random people on the street who their favorite literary character is, you will more than likely hear Atticus’s name. Clearly, the general public loves Atticus Finch. 

However, others have since pointed out that Atticus isn’t really all that great and his character actually undermines the impact of To Kill a Mockingbird. Haines discusses Atticus after her rereading of the novel. She writes, 

“Atticus is the unimpeachable and quintessential example of what it means to be a Good White Person, inspiring young people across the country to become lawyers and enabling white Americans to point again and again to a fictional character as proof that not all actual white people are racist” (¶ 10). 

Haines’ assertion that Attius is the “unimpeachable and quintessential example of what it means to be a Good White Person” is further supported by just how many people love this character. However, what struck me about this quote is actually the last part: Attitucs being the token non-racist white guy, fictional or not. This statement by Haines made me think of all the white people that assert they can’t be racist because they have a black friend, voted for Obama, think Idris Elba is hot, etc. (Side note: CNN published a great article on how to respond to these types of microaggressions back in 2020). 

I can imagine a white person being accused of racism and saying  something along the lines of “I can’t be racist, To Kill a Mockingbird is my favorite book!” and that is a problem. I think this harkens back to what Gay was arguing, that To Kill a Mockingbird does not take any risks in challenging white people’s understanding of racial injustice; it simply gives them a book to turn to so they can say they are enlightened to the issues black people face in America. “I understand racism, I read To Kill a Mockingbird!” Now, to be fair to Atticus, he did put him and his family at risk when he chose to defend Tom Robinson. Lest we forget that Bob Ewell did try to kill Jem and Scout as revenge. However, I’d still argue that To Kill a Mockingbird broaches the topic of systemic racial injustice in a safe and comfortable way when compared to more contemporary novels like Angie Thomas’ The Hate U Give. Let me unpack that a bit. 

TKAM vs. THUG: Dealing with Racial Injustice in a “Safe” Way

When we think about dismantling systemic racism and teaching antiracism, white people need to be educated the most on this topic. Just as Haines and Gay both wrote about, as black women, they’ve experienced racism firsthand and don’t need to be told what makes racial injustice so terrible. Additionally, they both argue that To Kill a Mockingbird is a novel written by a white woman for white people to read and think of themselves as part of the solution, not the problem.

Let’s bring up Atticus Finch again: as I‘ve already established, people love the guy. At the time, he embodied what every man should be: courageous, wise, well-dressed and willing to do anything to protect his children and community. While reading To Kill a Mockingbird, it is almost impossible to not side with Atticus. Lee does a phenomenal job at painting him as the pillar of justice and goodness within the novel. However, this is also part of the problem and where the novel begins to play it safe. If the reader is meant to agree with Atticus wholeheartedly, then there is no room for the novel to challenge their own beliefs. When Atticus decides to defend Tom Robinson, the reader is meant to feel like this is the right thing to do. Therefore, even though Tom is clearly innocent, the reader is still disappointed when he is declared guilty. After the infamous courtroom scene, the subject of racial injustice is barely touched on again. There is the moment of Tom’s death, but even that is arguably mishandled.

Tom faces a horrific death; he is shot 17 times in the back as he is trying to escape from prison. Yet, I’d argue that there are some readers of this novel that are unsympathetic and blame Tom for his own demise. This is not unlike the number of unarmed black people we see killed by police today, and their deaths are viewed in almost the exact same way:

“Maybe if they didn’t run they wouldn’t have been shot.”

“Maybe if they didn’t reach into their pocket for his wallet they wouldn’t have been shot.”

“Maybe if they just listened to the officer they wouldn’t have been shot.”

This leads into another issue I think occurs when teaching this novel: because of the time period it is set in, students and readers tend to think that racism is an issue of the past. White people reading To Kill a Mockingbird can easily point to it and say, “See? This stuff happened in the 30s, but times are different now. Stuff like this doesn’t happen anymore!” If this novel is not taught in an effective way, some students may also begin to believe this. Therefore, I’d argue that a more contemporary novel like The Hate U Give would be more effective in teaching about systemic racism and racial injustice. 

Within the first pages of Angie Thomas’ 2017 novel The Hate U Give, Thomas tackles the topics of racial injustice and police brutality head on. After getting pulled over on her way home from a party with her friend Khalil, the main character Starr Carter watches as Khalil (who is unarmed) gets shot by the officer. When Starr gets out of the car and tries to help Khalil, the officer then aims his gun at her. Unlike To Kill a Mockingbird where the trial of Tom Robinson is treated like a subplot, Thomas raises the stakes and highlights a plethora of issues within the first few pages of her novel. This moment also has ramifications for the rest of the story and it is not wrapped up in a nice bow like the trial in Mockingbird. Not only is Starr living a double life between her home in Garden Heights and her school, the predominately white Williamson Prep, she also must wrestle with the pressure of becoming a social activist as a result of Khalil’s death.

The novel deals heavily with Starr’s double consciousness, or her desire to stay true to her blackness while also trying to conform to a society controlled by the white majority. Additionally, unlike in Mockingbird where black characters are secondary, by having a black teenager narrate the story, we as readers are forced to view the world through a black person’s eyes. Although fictional, we are transported into a world that feels authentic and meet a cast of characters that feel believable. Unfortunately, the experiences represented are also not too uncommon; according to an 2021 NPR investigation,

“Since 2015, police officers have fatally shot at least 135 unarmed Black men and women nationwide. NPR reviewed police, court and other records to examine the details of the cases. At least 75% of the officers were white.”

Although tragic, this posits The Hate U Give as a novel that deals with an unarguably relevant issue happening in America today.

I would argue that having to wrestle with racial injustice in such close proximity, especially regarding a controversial issue such as police brutality, makes white people uncomfortable. This novel does not make it easy for readers to figure out right from wrong like in To Kill a Mockingbird; instead, it holds a mirror up to white people and asks them to think introspectively about how they might be part of a system that perpetuates racism. Obviously, this is difficult for some people to handle.

Take Starr’s friend Hayley for example; after making several racist comments towards Starr and blaming Khalil for his own death (“He was a drug dealer and a gangbanger. Somebody was gonna kill him eventually.”) Hayley tries to paint herself as the victim after Starr loses it on her. Hayley is the type of white person that is fine with adopting black culture (she loves singing rap songs and appropriates African American slang) yet becomes uncomfortable when actually broaching the subject of systemic racism. Hayley is the type of white person that would claim she can’t be racist because Starr is her best friend or because To Kill a Mockingbird is her favorite book. What makes Hayley such a great and interesting character is that she is so authentic. She is fine with Starr being black, until Starr’s experiences as a black person make her uncomfortable because it challenges her long held beliefs and white privilege. She says that she doesn’t see color as if it’s a positive thing when in reality she is invalidating a huge part of Starr and other black peoples’ identities and experiences.

These are all things that I’d argue make it difficult for some white people to read a novel that deals with racial injustice in such an authentic and raw way, because some readers might see nothing wrong with the things Hayley says. Starr not only challenges the characters within the text to reassess their biases, but she also challenges readers to think about how they might perpetuate racist ideals. 

Final Thoughts: The Problem of Feeling Safe When Dealing with Racial Injustice

In this way, The Hate U Give refuses to allow a safe way out when dealing with racial injustice. Disregarding Starr’s white boyfriend Chris, there is no white savior here for white people to connect with and agree with. They cannot point to a white character like Atticus and say, “I agree with that person. See? I understand racial injustice!” Instead, some white readers might think, “Wait, am I part of the problem?” then get uncomfortable and close the book entirely. As a white man, I am not going to deny that there were times where I did feel uncomfortable reading this novel, mainly with the violence. During some moments, I missed the ease of reading To Kill a Mockingbird and not even having to think about the injustice during Tom Robinson’s trial. 

Many people have suggested that The Hate U Give should replace To Kill a Mockingbird in schools. While reading The Hate U Give, I thought about how I could teach it if I was ever given the chance. I kept finding myself thinking that I would not be able to teach this novel in my classroom. Is that the truth or am I just uncomfortable with having to spark these difficult conversations surrounding systemic racism and racial injustice in my predominately white school district? I don’t really have an answer, but one thing I learned from taking this course is that sometimes difficult conversations need to be had in order for us to continue to grow as a society. We cannot, and should not, always feel safe, especially when this safety leads to a cycle of violence. By being comfortable and safe in our views, we risk becoming a part of the problem and perpetuating a system that is already disproportionately impacting millions of people of color in a negative way. Therefore, maybe it is time for us to move away from the comfort and safety of Atticus Finch and start to embrace the uncomfortable, but authentic, world of characters like Starr Carter. 

Amandla Stenberg as Starr Carter in the 2018 film The Hate U Give.

SJWs: Social Justice Writers

Leading the Charge 

            The term Social Justice Warrior or SJW is often used as a derogatory term given to a person that promotes socially progressive views. When tasked with coming up with ways in which teaching authentic writing can promote social justice, I immediately came up with the idea of changing this term into Social Justice Writers. This train of thought led me further into thinking about the age-old quote “the pen is mightier than the sword” and how currently, social justice writing is of the upmost importance. As future teachers of writing, we have a unique responsibility to arm our students with the tools necessary to become critical thinkers who challenge the social standards present within our society. That sounds like an overwhelming task, however, by simply teaching our students the value of authentic writing and their value as writers, change is more likely to happen.

Everyone Can Be a SJW

Io Acchi Kocchi Pen Spinning GIF | Gfycat
https://gfycat.com/hatefulinconsequentialdeer-extended-thumbaround-acchi-kocchi

            As I mentioned in my previous blog post, drawing from the guiding principles of the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE), one of the single, most important things we can instill in our students is that they are all writers. Not only is this a great thing to teach students for them to become better writers, but it also can teach them how to find and use their voice. Obviously, I am not talking about simply their ability to speak but rather how to take what they believe and their experiences and turn it into words on a page. Some students might have great things to say but have trouble articulating themselves and getting their words out. Other students might have great things to say but aren’t confident enough say them. In most cases, students who are only taught traditional writing are rarely given the opportunity to use their own voice and speak up. Therefore, we must teach our students the value of authentic writing, or “real writing, written for a real audience, for a real purpose, in a real forum” as defined by Leila Christenbury and Ken Lindblom in their book Continuing the Journey 2: Becoming a Better Teacher of Authentic Writing. As teachers of authentic writing, we have the ability to unlock our students’ power to convey their thoughts and feelings effectively through writing while also giving them confidence necessary to do so.  

            Along with ensuring that our students believe that they are writers, we also have to make sure that we engage our students in a way that allows all of their voices to be heard. Another important guiding principle from the NCTE is Principle 2.2: Writers bring multiliteracies, and they bring cultural and linguistic assets to whatever they do:

“Writers also bring their past writing and reading practices with them whenever they write or read. In short, everything they have experienced, who they are, where they have been, and what they have done impact their writing practices, literacies, and language attitudes.”

This is pivotal in viewing writing as a form of social justice because it highlights how writing is closely linked to identity. This principle also notes how writers are influenced by their experiences, whether positive or negative, which sometimes leads to writing being more emotionally impactful. However, the type of traditional writing instruction present in schools normally hinders students’ abilities to write about themselves, their emotions, their opinions or many other aspects linked to their identity. Traditional writing in the classroom is normally formal, impersonal, and lacking any depth beyond constructing an argument. Therefore, as teachers of authentic writing, we have to ensure that we give our students the tools and opportunities necessary for them to properly express their unique identities.

SJWs Express Themselves

           By allowing students to express themselves in their writing, they might learn how to speak up for themselves and articulate their emotions in a larger way. Jim Burke, author of The Six Academic Writing Assignments: Designing the User’s Journey, writes about how it is important for teachers to remember the three H’s – the head (intellect), heart (emotions), and hands (skills) – in mind when creating assignments. Although he was referring specifically to a yearlong research project he had his students complete, I find the three H’s to be an important guide to keep in mind when creating any writing assignment. Students are often only asked to focus on the head and the hands, but very rarely their heart. This can possibly be attributed to the fact that teachers may not want to open the floor to uncomfortable discussions surrounding emotions. However, sometimes part of teaching authentic writing IS to be uncomfortable with subject matter and that is perfectly okay as it emulates writing in the real world.

            In her 2019 blog post titled “Emotion and Intellect: An Unconventional Pair” for Writers Who Care, Cait O’Connor writes extensively about the importance and power of allowing students to express their emotions in writing. She states:

“Allow students to be angry, upset, sad, and emotional in their authentic writing. Because if they’re one or a few of these things when they write about an issue they care about, it’s probably because it affects them personally. And who are we to taper down their experiences, especially if those experiences have to do with racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, and ageism?”

I thought this was a really powerful quote because by not allowing our students to discuss their feelings in their writing, we are in some way contributing to their oppression. Students who are taught to express themselves in their writing can begin to realize the importance of what they have to say and can in turn help others who have gone through similar experiences. This type of discourse is the basis for many social movements as people facing similar types of oppression begin to share experiences and come together to overcome them.

SJWs Identify, Speak Up and Overcome  

Whistle Speak Up GIF by Transparency International - Find & Share ...
https://gph.is/g/apyDDBy

            In the real world, we need to be able to properly identify things that make us uncomfortable so we can figure out how to overcome that feeling. If something is bothering a student, they should be allowed to properly express themselves through their writing. Jim Burke also excels at this and includes many of his students’ voices throughout his book. He asks them about their thoughts on specific assignments, but more importantly, how they FEEL about the assignments. This type of discussion with students is almost unheard of but is essential in creating critical thinkers and people that might be more likely to speak up when dealing with things that they don’t like. It also goes a long way into promoting equity and fairness in the classroom by letting every student be heard and have a say in the way their writing instruction continues. This can also empower students to recognize that their voices matter and that they deserve to be treated fairly and with respect inside and outside the classroom.

            To continue my previous point, Jim emphasizes the importance of real writing by explaining:

“That spirit of engagement, the feeling that writing should be for real purposes to real people, that it can make a difference, can make things happen, is the reason that I design alternative writing assignments when I can and that I regularly bring into the classroom examples of writing from the real world that demonstrate and remind students of its importance.”

I think this quote highlights that a) Writing in the classroom is necessary to prepare our students for their lives outside of it and b) That writing does have the power to cause real change in the world. One example given by Leila Christenbury and Ken Lindblom in their book involved elementary school students that were fed up with the quality of the “mushy string beans” they were being served at lunch. The second-grade students wound up writing letters to the lunchroom manager and not only had the menu changed, but also were given the chance to taste the other available vegetables to find a suitable replacement. This story stood out to me because the students in this example were children and they were able to change something significant in their world through the power of authentic writing. If students at such a young age are able to cause change, imagine the change that students entering the world beyond the classroom can cause if they are taught authentic writing effectively.

To Arms!

            By teaching our students authentic writing, we are effectively giving them the tools necessary to cause real change in the world. Skills such as knowing how to write for specific audiences, expressing and articulating feelings in writing and understanding the close link between writing and identity are all things that students can learn through authentic writing. With those skills, we as teachers have the potential to arm our students with the tools necessary to create a fair and equitable world within the classroom and beyond.

Clientmoji

Attention Students: You Are All Writers!

Ready, Set… 

            One of the most important things that we can teach our students as teachers of authentic writing is that they are ALL writers. The National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE) even lists this as one of their guiding principles. Under Principle 2.1: Everyone is a writer, they state: “Everyone has the capacity to write. Writers are not static. They develop skills and enhance their writing skills throughout their writing lives; thus, writers grow continually. Becoming a better writer requires practice. The more writers write, the more familiar it becomes. As writers, sometimes they feel confident; at other times, they may feel afraid and insecure. Therefore, students learn to write by writing.” Therefore, the importance of us as teachers to instill confidence in our students can’t be overlooked. Here are five things I believe we can do as teachers to ensure that they not only begin to view themselves as writers, but also gain confidence in themselves as writers:

Oprah 'You Get A Car' | YOU'RE A WRITER, AND YOU'RE A WRITER! | image tagged in gifs | made w/ Imgflip video-to-gif maker
https://imgflip.com/gif/3xgz2j

And Away We Go…

1. Asking students what type of writing they do in their daily lives is effective in showing them that they are already writers.

            One of the most prominent forms of writing most students already engage in is social media writing. However, many students might not even consider this to be a form a real writing. As Ken Lindblom wrote in his 2015 post for the blog Writers Who Care, “Some may scoff at the significance of social media writing, but when students write on social media they are devising something to say, considering how to best say it to their intended audience, and they engage the results of their writing (that is, they either see that they are understood or they must rewrite it, so they are understood). This is real writing.”  Therefore, if this is explained to students, they might begin to reassess their roles as writers and begin to change their views on what constitutes real writing.

2. Exposing students to various forms of writing and having them emulate these forms can be effective.

            Just as the NCTE notes, writing is all about practice and writing in different forms can help students prepare for writing outside of the classroom as well. In another Writers Who Care post from 2014 titled Writing in the Work World, the authors Ann D. David, Dorothy Meiburg Weller, and Amber Funderburgh list a range of writing found from various areas of work. Compiling a list such as the one featured in the aforementioned blog post might help students who don’t believe that they are writers or that they will need writing in the future reconsider their position. This type of exposure to writing can also allow students to write to different audiences, something that traditional writing instruction fails to include as students are exclusively asked to only write to their teacher.

3. Talking with students throughout their writing processes is a great way to make them feel like real writers.

            Just like in the real world, a writing process normally involves a multitude of people fulfilling various roles. Unfortunately, the writing process most students are used to is a very lonely experience. By simply asking students how their process is going, they will begin to view themselves as writers who belong to a larger writing community. Jim Burke excels at this and even includes his students’ voices in his book The Six Academic Writing Assignments: Designing the User’s Journey. These accounts from students exemplify how effective this method is in getting students to talk and think like real writers. I might implement this by sitting with students one-on-one and simply asking them how their writing process is going. Students are very rarely asked questions about assignments directly and by giving them that opportunity it can allow them to start thinking metacognitively about their writing.

4. Creating a writing community within the classroom is of the upmost importance when trying to get students to view themselves as real writers.          

            One of my favorite aspects of writing is getting to collaborate with others, something I really didn’t start doing until I entered college. When I used to follow my writing process alone, I would constantly feel insecure in what I was writing, and that doubt would sometimes have a negative impact on the final product. By collaborating with others, I am able to get feedback and revise things that are unclear to the reader. Furthermore, by having another person read my work out loud, I am able to pick up on things that are awkward or need further clarification. Therefore, if students feel like they belong to a writing community and collaborate with one another frequently, they will begin to feel, think and act like real writers.

5. Modeling your own writing process in front of students can help them view themselves as real writers and further the creation of a positive writing community.

            Oftentimes, students view their teachers as all-knowing and infallible beings that exist only to educate. By modeling a writing process for our students, they will begin to realize that teachers are people just like them and can make mistakes. Modeling also comes with the chance that students will see their teacher perform something similar to their own writing process which can give them confidence in their own writing. It also opens the floor for students to provide feedback to a person in a position of authority which can help them realize they are real writers with a voice that matters and help them address a different audience.

To Infinity and Beyond!

            The list of ways we as teachers can help students feel like, think like, and talk like real writers is impossible to capture in a single blog post. I think the single most important thing we as teachers can instill in our students’ heads is that we don’t have to teach them how to be writers because they already are writers. Our job is to get them to internalize that feeling and give them the confidence necessary for them to continue to succeed as writers.

best wishes

Designing the User’s Journey: My Three Takeaways

My Thoughts So Far

            Hey everyone! I hope you are all staying healthy and are safe at home. On the bright side, having all of this extra time at home is great to catch up on some reading and writing. Currently, as many of you reading this already know, we are reading The Six Academic Writing Assignments: Designing the User’s Journey by Jim Burke in class. I really appreciate the amount of detail that Jim goes into regarding each of the writing assignments he discusses. In some instances, I find that he almost goes into too much detail and I find myself having to stop reading in order to really absorb what I just read. Two of my favorite things that Jim includes are his explanations of how he uses each of the assignments within his own classroom and the feedback from his students. I found that both of these inclusions are extremely valuable in generating ideas for my own future classroom and hammering in the fact that every assignment we create should be for a purpose and beneficial to our students.

My Three Takeaways

On that note, here are three things from the chapters we have read so far that I want to remember in the future:

Source: https://gph.is/2JD9Vq4

            1. First and foremost, from the introduction onward, I love that Jim keeps reiterating how we as teachers should view our students as “users – of our courses, materials, texts, and tools” and ourselves as “designers – who are charged with the task of removing from their journey through our curriculum what designers call ‘friction points’ that can undermine student’s learning and performance” (2). Going off this principle, Jim approaches each writing assignment with those ideas in mind and even explains his own design process for each. I can say from my own experience with lesson planning that it is extremely easy to lose sight of the purpose of a lesson during the design process. I can recall times where I spent too much time focusing on trying to create a fun lesson that when it came time to share what I came up with I couldn’t answer what the lesson was meant to accomplish. Therefore, I think Jim’s comparison of teachers as designers is extremely important to remember and should be at the forefront when coming up with lessons.

            2. Second, in Jim’s discussion of short answer assignments in chapter two, I loved his breakdown of the different levels of questions we should be asking out students. The different levels, found on page 61, are as follows:

  • Before Beginning to Read: These questions are used to activate connections in the reader’s brain before reading to frame the text within a larger inquiry or purpose.
  • On the Surface: These are literal or factual questions one can find answers to on the page.
  • Below the Surface: These questions mirror those on the SAT, ACT, AP, or state standard exams, as they emphasize close reading.
  • Above and Beyond the Surface:These questions involve critical reading and thus ask students to make connections with other texts, current and historical events, etc.

The aim of designing questions in this way, as Jim describes, is to give them some basis of logic and structure, rather than just asking easy questions with no real purpose other than to test if students have completed the assigned reading. I found this section to be worth remembering as well because it’s a great example of scaffolding by helping student’s work up to the harder, more critical thinking-oriented questions. This type of structure is definitely worth thinking about when designing any lesson or assignment.

            3. Finally, when discussing writing on demand or timed assignments, Jim notes that these types of assignments are often considered the hardest and most anxiety-inducing. To this day I still have trouble with writing on demand as I normally spend a lot of time brainstorming before I begin an assignment. I sometimes beat myself up after submitting a timed writing assignment because I remember important details I wanted to include after the fact. Therefore, this fact wasn’t necessarily surprising, but I think it is something to keep in mind when designing any type of assignment, especially timed ones. Jim gives some great examples of how to alleviate some of this anxiety such as allowing students to refer to their notes and giving them handouts as guides in order to provide them support when approaching writing on demand assignments.

In conclusion…

            Overall, I am excited to continue to read the rest of this book as I definitely think it will be a valuable resource to have in the future. I can see myself referring back to it when I need specific information about designing assignments that are integral to an English class. However, the main point that I keep replaying in my mind is to talk to and listen to students. Ultimately, it is their education and we as teachers have to make sure we are providing the best education, or experience as Jim would say, possible for them. I look forward to reading what everyone else came up with for their three takeaways and I hope everyone continues to stay healthy!

stay healthy helpful and calm

Three Things I Want to Remember When Teaching Authentic Writing

Preface:           

              As I was thinking about writing this post, my immediate thought was that I wanted to remember everything we have learned so far. I wish it was possible for me to remember every sentence down to the punctuation, however, I know that is unrealistic. Instead, I had to sift through everything we have discussed thus far to try and pull out the details I found most important. I am sure this list will change as we move closer towards the end of the semester (I can’t believe we are already almost halfway done!) but here are three things I hope to remember when I am teaching writing in the future.

Things to Remember:

  1. It is not only okay, but also encouraged to take risks when teaching in general but especially when it comes to teaching authentic writing. I will be the first person to admit that I am the dictionary definition of a perfectionist. I hardly ever stray from my routines and the thought of failing at anything gives me more anxiety than the times I was running late for an important exam. Therefore, I think that this point is something that I also have to internalize to benefit myself in the classroom and beyond. I believe students should recognize that failure is one of the greatest teachers and when it comes to writing, sometimes the scariest risks result in the best rewards. I would even argue that because authentic writing is intended to be real writing, it is almost impossible to not take risks.
Image result for next arrow
  1. Along with taking risks, it is important to teach students that authentic writing can have real consequences. Both of these two traits go hand in hand; taking a risk literally means exposing oneself to danger and authentic writing is no exception. In Chapter 4 of Continuing the Journey 2: Becoming a Better Teacher of Authentic Writing, Professor Lindblom and Leila Christenbury describe one of these “nightmare scenarios” on page 62. This point lends to my own issues with taking risks, however, I would make sure my students are mindful of the consequences that could arise from their own authentic writing. Furthermore, I would ensure that this point does not dissuade them from taking risks and remind them that risk is one thing that makes authentic writing so exciting.
Image result for last but not least image
  1. Finally, to piggyback off my second point, I want to remember that collaborating and running ideas by other teachers and administrators is a beneficial tactic. This doesn’t necessarily have to do with direct instruction of authentic writing; however, I think it is an important point to remember and reaffirms what makes teaching so great: collaborating and sharing ideas with others. Whether this collaboration is between teachers and students or teachers and administrators, I think it goes a long way into creating a positive learning environment for everyone involved. It also allows any possible issues with an authentic writing assignment to be identified before they can manifest outside of the classroom.

Moving Forward:

            As I said in the preface of this post, I am sure that this list of points will change as the semester continues. As I mentioned in both of my previous blog posts, I am constantly learning new things and being challenged on what I thought I already knew about teaching authentic writing. The further we continue in this class, the more confident I am becoming in my knowledge and ability to teach students how to write. I look forward to revisiting this post later on in the semester and seeing how or if this list has changed!

Bitmoji Image

Unlearning the Notions of Being a Writing Teacher

            I don’t know about anybody else, however, my expectations going into this class have been completely thrown out the window. While reading the prompt for this assignment, I struggled for awhile to come up with something to write about; not because I haven’t learned anything, rather there is so much I have to UNLEARN. Now that we are going into week four of class, I feel like there are already so many things I thought I knew about teaching writing that have been challenged or outright refuted. I expected to learn how to effectively teach students “important” skills such as the five-paragraph essay 🤢 or how to only prepare students for standardized tests 🤮. I am not only relieved, but also excited that this is not the case and that this course encompasses so much more than what I expected.

            One of the major things I’ve learned so far is what authentic writing truly is. As defined by Professor Lindblom and Leila Christenbury in their book Continuing the Journey 2: Becoming a Better Teacher of Authentic Writing, “authentic writing is real writing, written for a real audience, for a real purpose, in a real forum.” (pg. 6) Almost every part of this definition immediately struck me with a question: What is considered real writing? What is a real audience? What kind of purpose can classroom writing serve?

Image result for mind blown gif
https://gph.is/2AmePHo

It was then that I realized just how outdated and uninspired my idea of writing in school truly was. However, I think my previous teachers are more to blame for that considering only a select few ever taught me the importance of writing in a non-academic setting.

            I’ve always enjoyed writing, so I never really had an issue with writing assignments in high school. Yet, I can totally see how students who self-position themselves (I believe I am x, therefore I am x) as poor writers and don’t enjoy writing kind of become a self-fulfilling prophecy when teachers do not show them the real world application of writing. Therefore, I believe introducing our future students to authentic writing AND ensuring that all our students know that they all have the capacity to write (NCTE: Guiding Principle 2.1: Everyone is a writer.) are effective ways to engage and motivate our students to become better writers.

            Another thing that I have learned that coincides with my previous point is the ability to give students more agency when it comes to how they are assessed. As I mentioned in my previous blog post, as a future teacher I am really concerned about unintentionally being too harsh when grading my students’ writing.

That is why I absolutely loved the process of creating a student-teacher rubric as demonstrated in one of our previous classes. I thought this was such a wonderful idea to not only allow students to be involved in their own grading process, but also for the teacher to have a better understanding of what the students’ expectations are.

            According to a post on the website Teachers First, this type of process has also proven to engage and motivate students to want to complete the assignment due to it being intrinsically motivating. Although I’d imagine this type of process can backfire in some cases where students don’t take it seriously (“Just give us all A’s!”), I believe it has the potential to reshape the structure of the writing community within a classroom.

            As we continue our journey (see what I did there?) in this class, I am excited to have more of my thoughts challenged and learn more skills to be an effective teacher of writing.

Bitmoji Image

Challenges of a Writing Teacher

I think one of the main challenges as a writing teacher is to get students to care about writing. In school, many students view writing as a chore and dread having to complete writing assignments. This also can be a result of students lacking confidence in their writing. I believe that attitude plays a pivotal role in not only getting students to complete a task but also to be successful at it. If students can find a small bit of enjoyment in writing, I think it can go a long way to help them inside and outside the classroom.

I also think students’ apathy towards writing stems from them being unable to see how it will help them outside of school. Just as the blog post “Writing in the Work Worldby Ann D. David, Dorothy Meiburg Weller, and Amber Funderburgh mentions, writing is a necessary component of almost every profession. By teaching students this fact, I believe it may help them understand the importance of developing their writing skills. Oftentimes students hold the opinion that the things they learn in specific classes will never help them once they graduate. While this may ring true for other subjects, writing is a skill that will never lose its value.

Another challenge that I foresee when teaching writing is the emphasis on teaching students how to write specifically for exams. As we have discussed in class already, focusing on writing solely for test prep leaves students severely unprepared once they reach college. I believe it is important to find a balance between teaching students how to write for standardized tests while also introducing them to different forms of writing. Not only should students be exposed to different types of writing, but they should also understand why each type is important and when they should be utilized.

One of my biggest concerns when teaching writing is how to properly assess my students’ writing. My fear is that I might unintentionally be too critical and cause my students to feel discouraged about their work. Another concern I have is that I will be unable to properly articulate what I know about writing to my students. I know my own writing process and strategies that work for me; however, I feel like I might have some trouble conveying this to my students. Overall, teaching students how to write well can be challenging, yet, writing is a skill that they will continue to develop and utilize over the course of their entire lives.

Response to Writing Gaps

After reading the blog post  “Bridging the Writing Gap: Centering Student Voices in High School and College Writing.” by Kristen Marakoff and P.L. Thomas, I found that many of the writing gaps they discussed matched my high school experience. For example, The Choice Gap is something that I struggled with when transitioning from high school to college. I became so accustomed to having my teachers provide me with different prompts when assigning an essay. Normally, I would be able to look at the list of choices and pick whichever one I felt was the easiest for me to complete. In college, I can not think of a single professor that has given me a list of prompts to write an essay. Although, in English classes specifically, I have been given a choice between novels to write about, the topic of my essay had to be original. This still proves to be difficult for me and I find myself spending more time coming up with a topic than I do actually writing the essay. However, although it is difficult, I ultimately enjoy choosing my own topic because it allows me to be more creative and normally I am more invested in what I come up with as opposed to picking from a list of prompts.

The second gap that reflected my high school experience is The Revision Gap. I remember in multiple English classes having to provide drafts and participate in peer review sessions. These sessions normally focused on basic editing such as grammar, spelling and punctuation.

Introduce Yourself (Example Post)

This is an example post, originally published as part of Blogging University. Enroll in one of our ten programs, and start your blog right.

You’re going to publish a post today. Don’t worry about how your blog looks. Don’t worry if you haven’t given it a name yet, or you’re feeling overwhelmed. Just click the “New Post” button, and tell us why you’re here.

Why do this?

  • Because it gives new readers context. What are you about? Why should they read your blog?
  • Because it will help you focus you own ideas about your blog and what you’d like to do with it.

The post can be short or long, a personal intro to your life or a bloggy mission statement, a manifesto for the future or a simple outline of your the types of things you hope to publish.

To help you get started, here are a few questions:

  • Why are you blogging publicly, rather than keeping a personal journal?
  • What topics do you think you’ll write about?
  • Who would you love to connect with via your blog?
  • If you blog successfully throughout the next year, what would you hope to have accomplished?

You’re not locked into any of this; one of the wonderful things about blogs is how they constantly evolve as we learn, grow, and interact with one another — but it’s good to know where and why you started, and articulating your goals may just give you a few other post ideas.

Can’t think how to get started? Just write the first thing that pops into your head. Anne Lamott, author of a book on writing we love, says that you need to give yourself permission to write a “crappy first draft”. Anne makes a great point — just start writing, and worry about editing it later.

When you’re ready to publish, give your post three to five tags that describe your blog’s focus — writing, photography, fiction, parenting, food, cars, movies, sports, whatever. These tags will help others who care about your topics find you in the Reader. Make sure one of the tags is “zerotohero,” so other new bloggers can find you, too.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started